<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Welcome to the ManpowerGroup Employment Blawg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Office: Legal Analysis and Contest</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/the-office-legal-analysis-and-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/the-office-legal-analysis-and-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Office, The]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dunder mifflin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwight schrute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manpowergroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark toth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=8830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my humble opinion The Office is the world&#8217;s #1 employment law training aid. All you have to do is (1) watch it and (2) do the exact opposite of everything you see. To help enhance your viewing experience, each week I provide a critique of the action from an employment lawyer’s perspective. We also conduct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion <em>The Office</em> is the world&#8217;s #1 employment law training aid. All you have to do is (1) watch it and (2) do the exact opposite of everything you see.</p>
<p>To help enhance your viewing experience, each week I provide a critique of the action from an employment lawyer’s perspective. We also conduct a weekly “Are You Smarter Than a Lawyer?” Contest.<strong> </strong>Anyone who leaves a comment below identifying a legal issue that I missed will win a valuable prize.</p>
<p><strong>Last Night&#8217;s Episode:</strong> <em>Jury Duty</em></p>
<p><strong>The Plot:</strong> Here’s NBC’sfficial description: &#8221;Jim returns after being away for jury duty and a curious Dwight will not stop questioning him about the case; Angela and the Senator welcome their new baby.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>My Analysis:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Andy&#8217;s Stress Release<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Andy forced the warehouse employees to stop working and clear out so that he could do a &#8220;stress-release dance&#8221; to the theme from <em>Footloose</em>. In addition to hurting productivity, Andy made a huge mess, imperiled worker safety (mostly his own), wasted company resources, made an inappropriate comment and committed a copyright violation that could have Kenny Loggins coming after the company.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$$$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Lies, Lies and More Lies<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: As we discussed in our most recent <a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/01/27/webinar-replay-slideshare-2/">webinar</a>, dishonesty is the #1 way to get fired fast. Jim lied about being on jury duty. Andy lied about Jim lying (and about no one ever lying to him before). The lies continued to pile up as they both engaged in an attempted cover-up. Dwight conducted an &#8220;investigation&#8221; that followed none of our patented <a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/01/26/2012-employment-law-tool-box/">Investigation Tips</a> contained in our 2012 Employment Law Tool Box. The company should conduct an actual investigation with a real HR person and fire them both. In addition, Angela lied about her baby&#8217;s due date (and possibly, its paternity).<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$$$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Don&#8217;t Touch<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Andy gave Jim an over-the-top hug and strange handshake when Jim returned the the office. He later slapped Jim as punishment (after telling him that he was in &#8220;deep doo-doo&#8221;) for his jury duty lies. Touching employees is never a good idea (especially if you&#8217;re Andy).<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Emotional Distress<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Stanley, Phyllis, Darryl and others expressed that they suffered various levels of distress due to Jim&#8217;s prolonged absence. The value of their claims was diminished when they later encouraged Jim to leave work to care for his kids.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Defamation<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>:  Dwight made several defamatory comments about Jim (including calling him a &#8220;pervert&#8221;) and Toby (&#8220;the most forgettable man on the planet&#8221;). Dwight also made multiple public pronouncements proclaiming that he is the father of Angela&#8217;s baby, which may not be true. Virtually everyone who saw Angela&#8217;s baby made a disparaging comment about him.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Inappropriate Comments<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Andy made comments about his and Jim&#8217;s posteriors. Stanley made a comment about Jim&#8217;s posterior. Kevin, Oscar, Ryan, Phyllis and Angela made inappropriate race/national origin-based comments. Gabe made a creepy comment about the maternity ward. Kevin called Erin &#8220;bimbo.&#8221; Erin called Kevin &#8220;himbo.&#8221; Kevin and Erin made potentially unlawful comments about obesity. Dwight made multiple inappropriate comments to Angela while contending that he&#8217;s the baby&#8217;s father.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Gambling<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Erin and others may have violated state anti-gambling laws by conducting a baby pool.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Dwight on NCIS?<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Jim tricked Dwight into traveling across the country to perform as an extra on NCIS. Jim (and possibly the company) could be on the hook for travel and other expenses/damages.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Invasion of Privacy<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Oscar, Kevin, Erin and Gabe charged into Angela&#8217;s hospital room with video cameras rolling, potentially creating invasion of privacy and other claims.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Drug References<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Andy made Dwight take an imaginary &#8220;chill pill.&#8221; It seemed to work &#8212; temporarily. Angela made a reference to drugs at a &#8220;James Taylor concert.&#8221;<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Corruption of Minors<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Kevin bought Angela&#8217;s newborn a violent Call of Duty video game. Jim and Pam brought their kids into the office solely to make everyone feel sympathy for them. They made their daughter lie about artwork she didn&#8217;t create, which resulted in her sobbing uncontrollably.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Breach of Confidentiality<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Approximately 0.8 seconds after promising Angela he wouldn&#8217;t disclose that Angela&#8217;s baby was born out of wedlock, Oscar disclosed that information to Dwight who kept the secret for approximately 0.7 seconds.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Interference with Medical Care<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Dwight attempted to interfere with the baby&#8217;s circumcision.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Fire Hazard<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Dwight smoked a cigar in the workplace and then extinguished it in a highly unsafe manner. Andy observed Dwight&#8217;s actions but did nothing.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$$</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Issue</span>: Theft of Company Time<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Description</span>: Once again, no employees did any discernible work.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Risk</span>: $$</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/the-office-legal-analysis-and-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Employment Data: Good or Bad?</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/latest-employment-data-good-or-bad-9/</link>
		<comments>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/latest-employment-data-good-or-bad-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureau of labor statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor force participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=8858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each month here on the Blawg, we update all the latest employment indicators in the handy box to the right within nanoseconds of their release by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Here’s the latest (and what you can do about it) &#8230; Employment Situation Up It looks like the U.S. labor market&#8217;s momentum is continuing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>Each month here on the Blawg, we update all the latest employment indicators in the handy box to the right within nanoseconds of their release by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
<p>Here’s the latest (and what you can do about it) &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Employment Situation Up</strong></p>
<p>It looks like the U.S. labor market&#8217;s momentum is continuing into the new year.</p>
<p>According to the government’s official figures, total nonfarm payroll employment was up 243,000 jobs &#8212; the biggest uptick since last April. That&#8217;s now seven straight months of adding 100,000+ jobs.</p>
<p>The economy has added an average of 201,000 jobs over the past three months &#8212; just over the 200,000 bar most economists say is needed for a sustained recovery.</p>
<p><strong>Unemployment Down</strong></p>
<div>
<p>Unemployment dropped to 8.3%, the lowest in three years. The rate has steadily declined from 9.1% in August.</p>
<p>The number of unemployed declined to 12.8 million, also a three-year low. However, the number of long-term unemployed (defined as jobless for 27 weeks or longer) remained virtually unchanged at 5.5 million.</p>
<p>Despite the continued improvement, unemployment continues to remain far above the 6% rate considered “full employment” by most economists.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Labor Force Participation Unchanged</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Many economists feel that the unemployment rate is somewhat misleading due to what the data omits. Instead, some rely more on overall labor force participation and the employment population ratio.</p>
<p>Labor force participation stayed at 63.7% while the employment-population ratio increased slightly to 58.5%.</p>
<p>Another number examined by economists is “discouraged workers” (those not currently seeking employment because they believe no work is available). That number is 1.1 million — about the same as last year.</p>
<p><strong>Which Sectors Are Growing?</strong></p>
<p>The private sector was up 257,000 jobs, while the public sector cut 14,000 jobs. Here are the sectors that changed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Professional &amp; Business Services (+70,000) (mostly employment services, finance and engineering)</li>
<li>Manufacturing (+50,000) (mostly fabricated metals, machinery, auto)</li>
<li>Leisure &amp; Hospitality (+44,000) (mostly food/drink)</li>
<li>Health care (+33,000) (mostly hospitals/ambulatory)</li>
<li>Construction (+21,000)</li>
<li>Wholesale (+14,000)</li>
<li>Mining (+10,000)</li>
<li>Retail (+9,000) (mostly department stores, health/personal, auto)</li>
<li>Information (-13,000) (mostly video/audio)</li>
<li>Government (-14,000) (-276,000 in the past year)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What About Wages?</strong></p>
<p>Average hourly earnings moved up four cents to $23.29. However, wages were up a scant 1.9% year-over-year which isn&#8217;t enough to keep up with inflation.</p>
<p><strong>What Can Employers Do?</strong></p>
<p>ManpowerGroup is here to help.</p>
<p>Talentism has replaced capitalism as the absolute #1 key differentiator. The companies that get and keep talent will win. Those that don&#8217;t, won&#8217;t. It&#8217;s really that simple.</p>
<p><a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/MAN/1667396585x0x536090/7ab7a37d-e8ca-434e-ab4f-a824d600b3e5/How%20to%20Navigate%20the%20Human%20Age.pdf">Here&#8217;s</a> ManpowerGroup&#8217;s latest insight paper, packed with everything you need to know about finding the right talent and implementing the right work models and people practices to help your company WIN in the changing world of work.</p>
<p><em>(Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Wall Street Journal, ManpowerGroup)</em></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/03/latest-employment-data-good-or-bad-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quarterly Social Media Index</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/quarterly-social-media-index/</link>
		<comments>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/quarterly-social-media-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law webinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark toth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=8784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube: What are YOU on? In last week&#8217;s webinar, we asked our 3,423 viewers a series of questions to see how you&#8217;re really using social media. Here was our first question &#8230; More than two-thirds (67%) now use a SM tool. That&#8217;s a slight dip from last quarter&#8217;s 71% (the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube: What are YOU on?</p>
<p>In last week&#8217;s webinar, we asked our 3,423 viewers a series of questions to see how you&#8217;re <em>really</em> using social media.</p>
<p>Here was our first question &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-11.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8849" title="Blawg SM Index 1" src="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-11-e1328200133719.png" alt="" width="447" height="277" /></a></p>
<p>More than two-thirds (67%) now use a SM tool. That&#8217;s a slight dip from last quarter&#8217;s 71% (the highest ever in our quarterly index) but still up quite a bit over the previous quarter&#8217;s 58%.</p>
<p>That led to our next question &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-21.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8850" title="Blawg SM Index 2" src="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-21-e1328200188727.png" alt="" width="453" height="278" /></a></p>
<p>This is where things got a little surprising. After reigning as the undisputed heavyweight SM champion in every one of our quarterly indices going back to the beginning of time, Facebook (26%) appears to have suddenly stumbled to fall behind LinkedIn (51%) as the go-to tool in the business world.</p>
<p>Also interesting was the fact that in only two months on the Index, Google Plus has jumped from nothing to a fairly substantial 18%. Much of that appears to have come at the expense of Facebook. (As you&#8217;ve probably noticed, there&#8217;s quite a bit of anti-Facebook backlash percolating in the SM universe. The news this morning that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg could reap as much as $28 billion in Facebook&#8217;s IPO could fan the flames even more.)</p>
<p>Almost no one uses anything other than three as their primary tool. YouTube and Twitter are both hovering around 2%.</p>
<p>So, how much time are you spending on SM? Here&#8217;s what you said &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8856" title="Blawg SM Index 3" src="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Blawg-SM-Index-3-e1328269715531.png" alt="" width="452" height="278" /></a></p>
<p>The results were rather surprising (at least to me):</p>
<ul>
<li><em>One-third</em> of you spend a grand total of <em>zero</em> minutes each week using SM @ work.</li>
<li>The most popular answer was 1-30 minutes, capturing another third or so.</li>
<li>Less than one-fifth spend more than an hour a week on SM.</li>
<li>Approximately one-tenth spend 3 or more hours on SM, with 1% spending more than 10 hours. <em>Yikes.</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Social Media Freaking You Out?</span></p>
<p>In our pre-webinar survey, confusion over social media rules was repeatedly named as a top concern. For all the latest legal developments in that area, check out our <a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/01/27/webinar-replay-slideshare-2/">webinar replay</a> and our handy <a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/01/26/2012-employment-law-tool-box/">2012 Employment Law Tool Box</a>, which includes a sample social media policy courtesy of the fine folks at McGuire Woods LLP.</p>
<p>As always, thanks for your participation. Stay tuned for more on the latest trends affecting the wonderful world of workplace law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/quarterly-social-media-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workplace Celebration Contest Winner</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/workplace-celebration-contest-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/workplace-celebration-contest-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Celebrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manpowergroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark toth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/?p=8834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats to COURTNEY, winner of our monthly &#8220;Spot the Bogus Workplace Celebration&#8221; Contest. Courtney was the first astute observer to identify &#8220;Bring Lady GaGa to Work Day&#8221; as the fake holiday. Believe it or not, the rest are very real. Click here for the full list. Thanks for your participation &#8212; enjoy the rest of the month!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to COURTNEY, winner of our monthly &#8220;Spot the Bogus Workplace Celebration&#8221; Contest.</p>
<p>Courtney was the first astute observer to identify &#8220;Bring Lady GaGa to Work Day&#8221; as the fake holiday. Believe it or not, the rest are very real. Click <a href="http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2011/12/01/december-employee-celebrations-3/">here</a> for the full list.</p>
<p>Thanks for your participation &#8212; enjoy the rest of the month!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manpowerblogs.com/toth/2012/02/02/workplace-celebration-contest-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

