<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Company Loyalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Contemporary Working Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Moravec</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/comment-page-1/#comment-12121</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Moravec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/#comment-12121</guid>
		<description>Traditional employee loyalty is dead.Public and private organizations are into a phase of creative disassembly where constant reinvention and adjustments are constant. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are being shed by Chevron, NUMI, Wells Fargo Bank, HP, Starbucks etc. and the state, counties and cities. Even solid world class institutions like the University of California Berkeley are firing staff, faculty and part-time lecturers. Estimates are that the State of California may jettison 47,000 positions.

Yet many employees, professionals and faculty cling to old assumptions about one of the most critical relationship of all: the implied, unwritten contract between employer and employee.

Until recently, loyalty was the cornerstone of that relationship. Employers promised job security and a steady progress up the hierarchy in return for employees’s fitting in, performing in prescribed ways and sticking around. Longevity was a sign of employeer-employee relations; turnover was a sign of dysfunction. None of these assumptions apply today. Organizations can no longer guarantee employment and lifetime careers, even if they want to.

Organizations that paralyzed themselves with an attachment to “success brings success’ rather than “success brings failure’ are now forced to break the implied contract with employees – a contract nurtured by management that the future can be controlled.

Jettisoned employees are finding that the hard won knowledge, skills and capabilities earned while being loyal are no longer valuable in the employment market place.

What kind of a contract can employers and employees make with each other? The central idea is both simple and powerful: the job or position is a shared situation. Employers and employees face market and financial conditions together, and the longevity of the partnership depends on how well the for-profit or not-for-profit continues to meet the needs of customers and constituencies.  Neither employer nor employee has a future obligation to the other. Organizations train people. Employees develop the kind of security they really need – skills, knowledge and capabilities that enhance future employability.

The partnership can be dissolved without either party considering the other a traitor. Loyalty is dead – get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional employee loyalty is dead.Public and private organizations are into a phase of creative disassembly where constant reinvention and adjustments are constant. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are being shed by Chevron, NUMI, Wells Fargo Bank, HP, Starbucks etc. and the state, counties and cities. Even solid world class institutions like the University of California Berkeley are firing staff, faculty and part-time lecturers. Estimates are that the State of California may jettison 47,000 positions.</p>
<p>Yet many employees, professionals and faculty cling to old assumptions about one of the most critical relationship of all: the implied, unwritten contract between employer and employee.</p>
<p>Until recently, loyalty was the cornerstone of that relationship. Employers promised job security and a steady progress up the hierarchy in return for employees’s fitting in, performing in prescribed ways and sticking around. Longevity was a sign of employeer-employee relations; turnover was a sign of dysfunction. None of these assumptions apply today. Organizations can no longer guarantee employment and lifetime careers, even if they want to.</p>
<p>Organizations that paralyzed themselves with an attachment to “success brings success’ rather than “success brings failure’ are now forced to break the implied contract with employees – a contract nurtured by management that the future can be controlled.</p>
<p>Jettisoned employees are finding that the hard won knowledge, skills and capabilities earned while being loyal are no longer valuable in the employment market place.</p>
<p>What kind of a contract can employers and employees make with each other? The central idea is both simple and powerful: the job or position is a shared situation. Employers and employees face market and financial conditions together, and the longevity of the partnership depends on how well the for-profit or not-for-profit continues to meet the needs of customers and constituencies.  Neither employer nor employee has a future obligation to the other. Organizations train people. Employees develop the kind of security they really need – skills, knowledge and capabilities that enhance future employability.</p>
<p>The partnership can be dissolved without either party considering the other a traitor. Loyalty is dead – get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manpowerblogs.com/holmes/2008/03/10/company-loyalty/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>To me, this is too easy a easy question. It&#039;s simply unethical to use company time to look for a new job - no matter how unhappy you might be at your current job. 

But there can be some gray area, depending on the nature of your job and the demands of your company. Let&#039;s say you&#039;re required to put in eight hours a day, but you don&#039;t have that many &quot;time sensitive&quot; things to do in the course of a day (e.g., meetings, calls with clients). If you were to take a half hour to leave the building to talk with a potential employer on a cell phone, you owe it to your current employer to make up that half hour at the end of the day. This is a bit easier, though, if you work at home since there&#039;s less of a chance you&#039;ll arouse suspicion.

By all means, be discreet about your job search but if your employer is expecting you to fulfill the duties of your role, it&#039;s just plain dishonest if you&#039;re using some of that time to look for another job, and even worse if that&#039;s causing you to miss deadlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, this is too easy a easy question. It&#8217;s simply unethical to use company time to look for a new job &#8211; no matter how unhappy you might be at your current job. </p>
<p>But there can be some gray area, depending on the nature of your job and the demands of your company. Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re required to put in eight hours a day, but you don&#8217;t have that many &#8220;time sensitive&#8221; things to do in the course of a day (e.g., meetings, calls with clients). If you were to take a half hour to leave the building to talk with a potential employer on a cell phone, you owe it to your current employer to make up that half hour at the end of the day. This is a bit easier, though, if you work at home since there&#8217;s less of a chance you&#8217;ll arouse suspicion.</p>
<p>By all means, be discreet about your job search but if your employer is expecting you to fulfill the duties of your role, it&#8217;s just plain dishonest if you&#8217;re using some of that time to look for another job, and even worse if that&#8217;s causing you to miss deadlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

